Fidelity customers with certain types of accounts have noticed onerous deposit limits in recent days. In some cases, some people find that their deposits are on hold for several weeks.
What’s happening: The financial services company has recently seen a spike in fraudulent activity and “needs us to take immediate steps to address the issue,” a spokesperson said in an email. Although Fidelity hasn’t confirmed what these actions specifically mean, affected Reddit users say the new fraud prevention measures are too aggressive and have personal experiences that are frustrating. Reporting.
The fraud scheme in question went viral earlier this month, sometimes under the hashtag #fidelityboyz. One post, which has more than 4,500 likes on Instagram, shows several men wearing Fidelity T-shirts tossing large sums of cash into the air.
This has similarities to the “unlimited funds problem” that engulfed Chase Bank just a few weeks ago.
The “Fidelity Boys” trend basically promised customers a hack to earn free cash. This involved instantly withdrawing funds via fake checks before Fidelity actually cleared the deposit. In reality, this is just a check scam, and those who attempt this can face serious consequences.
Meanwhile, the type of account affected is called a Cash Management Account (CMA). These are interest-bearing accounts with the ability to pay bills, cash out, and transfer checks. Fidelity calls it “an alternative to traditional banking” on its website.
However, customers are now reporting on forums that attempts to make legitimate transfers or check deposits were put on hold, preventing them from accessing the funds they needed.
On Friday, the Wall Street Journal reported that Fidelity’s deposit limits have been lowered from $100,000 to $1,000 in some cases, adding that fraud concerns are specifically related to mobile app check deposits. Users on Reddit claim they found their electronic fund transfers on hold when they tried to withdraw funds from other banks to their Fidelity accounts.
One user wrote, “I’m seriously looking for a CMA account, but it takes weeks to send money and I can’t wait.” Another report said: “Fidelity holds two deposits until October 11th. There are bills to pay.”
Fidelity’s stance is to focus on preventing fraud.
“We recently identified individuals attempting to use Fidelity accounts to commit fraud. We do not tolerate illegal activity of any kind,” the spokesperson said. “To be clear, these individuals were committing fraud with respect to their own accounts. No other customer information, accounts or assets were at risk.”
In addition to social media, the Fidelity scam was also popular among scammers on the messaging app Telegram, according to scam blog FrankonFraud. However, unlike Chase’s “Glitch,” this plan did not involve raiding ATMs for cash.
FrankonFraud’s blog post says, “Since Fidelity does not have ATMs, this scheme appears to focus on depositing fake or altered checks through mobile apps, often at newly opened and The money will be deposited into your account. “After the check is posted, people quickly withdraw money using a debit card or wire transfer.”
Fidelity’s new safeguards appear to have largely stopped the illegal activity. The problem now is that some customers, ostensibly doing nothing wrong, are being told they have to wait until they can withdraw or invest the funds that are subject to the hold. . The company has not disclosed how it plans to resolve this issue.
Money details:
America’s Best Banks 2023-2024
Tracking down customers who tried TikTok’s ‘Money Glitch’ could lead to fraud charges
How to cure money stress? Earn (at least) $100,000 a year
© Copyright 2024 Money Group, LLC. All rights reserved.
This article originally appeared on Money.com and may contain affiliate links from which Money receives compensation. The opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author and are not those of any third party, and have not been reviewed, approved, or otherwise endorsed. Offers are subject to change without notice. Please read Money’s full disclaimer for more information.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
